history1910sdecade-flashback

What Were Babies Named in 1914?

September 1, 2025

The year was 1914. Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in Sarajevo in June, triggering a war that would consume Europe. Woodrow Wilson was in the White House. The US was not yet in the war — that was three years away — and about 2.9 million babies were born. A remarkable number of them were named John or Mary.

Here's what the SSA data shows for 1914.

Top 15 Boy Names, 1914

RankName1914 babies2024 rankStatus
1John76,141#21The most durable name in American history — top 5 for over a century
2William58,124#5Back in the top 5 in 2024
3James55,809#5Outlasted almost everything
4Robert41,023#90Sliding but still on the board
5Joseph40,217#32Steady across 110 years
6George36,118#195Recovering via vintage and royal associations
7Charles34,906#50Back from a mid-century dip
8Edward27,334#154Holding at mid-chart
9Thomas26,882#39Quietly resilient
10Henry25,761#9Back in the top 10 — one of the great vintage revivals
11Frank20,104#573Peaked in the early 20th century; beginning a quiet revival
12Walter19,887#223Reviving as a vintage cool name
13Arthur17,613#207Reviving strongly, especially in Europe
14Harold17,421#988Mid-century peak; not returning
15Albert14,897#467Scientific associations keep it alive but not rising

Top 15 Girl Names, 1914

RankName1914 babies2024 rankStatus
1Mary64,286#132A century at #1 ended in the 1940s; holding on at the chart's edge
2Helen33,217#865Peaked in this era; a very slow revival beginning
3Dorothy28,405#693Not yet back but on parents' radar
4Margaret23,941#209Actively reviving — longest recovery arc of any 1914 girl name
5Ruth22,873#173Biblical and rising in the 2020s
6Mildred21,084#2,412Almost entirely out of use
7Anna20,612#35The lone top-10 survivor still in the modern top 50
8Elizabeth19,377#17Top 20 in 2024 — the most resilient girl name in American history
9Frances17,836#351Quiet mid-chart presence; not yet reviving fast
10Marie16,924#431Slow decline; French feel keeps it alive
11Mabel14,803#285Actively reviving as a vintage pick
12Alice14,591#57One of the strongest vintage revivals on this list
13Florence13,872#364Reviving, helped by Italian city associations
14Lillian13,204#77Back in the top 100
15Rose12,937#87Steady vintage favourite; not fully revived but holding

What stands out

John's dominance. In 1914, roughly 1 in 30 boys born in the US was named John. In 2024, John is #21 with about 8,000 babies — still alive, but a shadow of its 1914 presence. No name has ever maintained the kind of singular dominance John held across the first half of the twentieth century.

The boys' list has aged almost perfectly. Ten of the 15 boys' names from 1914 are still inside the top 225 today. Five are back in the top 50. Henry — at #9 in 2024 — has made one of the most dramatic comebacks of any name in the dataset, going from #10 in 1914 to near-invisibility in the 1970s and back to the top 10 now.

The girls' list is splitting. The 1914 girls' names are falling into two camps: the genuinely timeless ones (Elizabeth, Anna, Alice, Lillian, Rose, Margaret) are reviving; the era-specific ones (Mildred, Helen, Dorothy) remain mostly in dormancy. The gap between these groups is widening.

The great concentration. In 1914, the top 15 boys' names accounted for an estimated 35% of all male births. In 2024, the top 15 boys' names account for around 18%. Naming in 1914 was dramatically more homogeneous — there were far fewer names in circulation, and the leading names dominated in a way modern parents find almost impossible to imagine.

The vintage revival, measured. Of the 1914 girls' list: Alice is at #57, Lillian at #77, Rose at #87, Margaret at #209, Florence at #364, Mabel at #285. These are the names parents in 2024 think of as "charming and old but not too old." Names from 1914 now have the century of distance that makes them feel genuinely fresh again.

See the full rankings for 1914 or explore names like Henry, Alice, Margaret and Elizabeth in depth.


Data: U.S. Social Security Administration 1914 and 2024 releases. SSA records from the early 20th century are less complete than modern data — early registrations were not universal.

← Back to all posts